Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN)

Orthodontics is a specialized branch of dentistry focused on diagnosing, preventing, and correcting irregularities of the teeth and jaws. While many people seek orthodontic treatment for aesthetic reasons to improve their smile or appearance, the main purpose of orthodontics is to ensure proper function and oral health. However, not everyone with crooked teeth necessarily needs orthodontic treatment. Some dental irregularities may be minor and have little or no effect on oral function or aesthetics.

This raises an important question: how can we objectively decide who really needs orthodontic treatment?

To address this issue, dental researchers developed a standardized system known as the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). The IOTN helps clinicians and dental health authorities assess and prioritize patients based on the severity of their orthodontic problems. It ensures that treatment decisions are made fairly and based on clinical need, rather than personal opinions or social pressure.

The Purpose of the IOTN

Before the IOTN was developed, orthodontic treatment need was often determined subjectively. Some dentists might have considered a certain level of crowding or spacing as needing treatment, while others might not. This inconsistency made it difficult to manage resources, especially in public health systems where orthodontic treatment was funded by the government.

Advertisements

The main purpose of the IOTN is to:

  • Quantify and standardize orthodontic need across patients.
  • Prioritize treatment for those who need it most.
  • Provide a fair, objective assessment that can be used by dentists, orthodontists, and public health authorities.
  • Balance benefits against potential disadvantages, such as cost, time, or risks associated with treatment.

 

The IOTN allows both clinicians and patients to understand how serious a malocclusion (a misalignment of teeth) is, and whether treatment is necessary, optional, or unnecessary.

 

Components of the IOTN

The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need consists of two main components:

  1. The Dental Health Component (DHC)
  2. The Aesthetic Component (AC)

Each component measures a different aspect of orthodontic need, and when combined, they provide a complete picture of both functional and aesthetic requirements.

The Dental Health Component (DHC)

The Dental Health Component of the IOTN assesses how a malocclusion affects the health and function of the teeth and jaws. It was developed based on an earlier index used by the Swedish Dental Health Board, which linked the degree of malocclusion to the amount of financial assistance a patient could receive for orthodontic treatment.

The DHC categorizes malocclusions into five grades, ranging from very little or no need for treatment to very great need. The assessment is made by identifying the single worst feature of a patient’s malocclusion. In other words, if a patient has multiple irregularities, the most severe one determines their overall DHC grade.

To simplify diagnosis, a hierarchy of severity is often used:

  1. Missing teeth
  2. Overjet (horizontal overlap of front teeth)
  3. Crossbite
  4. Displacement of contact points
  5. Overbite (vertical overlap of front teeth)

Each of these features can have different levels of severity, which determine the patient’s grade.

Grade 1 – No Need for Treatment

Grade 1 represents cases where there is no need for orthodontic treatment. Patients in this category have teeth that are well aligned and functionally adequate.

Examples:

  • Extremely minor malocclusions
  • Tooth displacements less than 1mm

 

Such cases are considered within the normal range of dental variation and do not require orthodontic correction.

Grade 2 – Little Need for Treatment

Grade 2 represents minor irregularities that are unlikely to cause health problems or significant aesthetic concerns. Treatment may be optional but is not clinically necessary.

Common findings include:

  • Slightly increased overjet (3.6–6mm) with competent lips
  • Small reverse overjet (0.1–1mm)
  • Minor crossbites with up to 1mm discrepancy
  • Tooth displacements of 1–2mm
  • Mild open bites or overbites without trauma
  • Small spacing or mild crowding

 

These patients usually have functional occlusion, and treatment is often requested for cosmetic reasons rather than medical necessity.

Grade 3 – Moderate Need for Treatment

Grade 3 cases are borderline — they may or may not require orthodontic treatment depending on other factors like speech, function, or patient concern.

Examples include:

  • Moderate overjet (3.5–6mm) with incompetent lips
  • Reverse overjet (1–3.5mm)
  • Crossbites with 1–2mm discrepancy between retruded contact position and intercuspal position
  • Tooth displacements of 2–4mm
  • Open bites of 2–4mm
  • Deep overbites without gingival or palatal trauma

 

For patients in Grade 3, orthodontic treatment is often justified if the condition affects speech, function, or appearance significantly.

Grade 4 – Definite Need for Treatment

Grade 4 represents definite need for orthodontic treatment. The irregularities in this group are severe enough to cause functional or dental health problems.

Examples include:

  • Increased overjet of 6–9mm
  • Reverse overjet >3.5mm with masticatory or speech difficulties
  • Crossbites with >2mm discrepancy
  • Open bites greater than 4mm
  • Deep bites with trauma to the gums or palate
  • Partially erupted, impacted, or tipped teeth
  • Severe crowding
  • Presence of supernumerary (extra) teeth
  • Hypodontia (missing teeth) requiring space closure or pre-restorative orthodontics

 

Patients in this category clearly benefit from orthodontic intervention, and treatment is recommended to prevent long-term oral health issues.

Grade 5 – Very Great Need for Treatment

Grade 5 represents the most severe cases, where orthodontic treatment is essential for both function and health.

Examples include:

  • Impeded eruption of teeth due to crowding, retained deciduous teeth, or supernumerary teeth
  • Extensive hypodontia with restorative implications (e.g., missing multiple teeth in one quadrant)
  • Extremely large overjets (>9mm)
  • Severe reverse overjets (>3.5mm) with speech or eating difficulties
  • Craniofacial abnormalities such as cleft lip and palate
  • Submerged deciduous (baby) teeth

 

These patients usually have significant functional, aesthetic, and psychological concerns. Orthodontic treatment is not only beneficial but necessary to improve oral function, facial aesthetics, and overall quality of life.

The Aesthetic Component (AC)

The Aesthetic Component of the IOTN evaluates how much a malocclusion affects the appearance of a person’s teeth. It recognizes that aesthetics play an important role in orthodontic treatment decisions, especially among adolescents and adults who may be more conscious about their smile.

The AC is based on a series of 10 standardized photographs showing different levels of dental attractiveness, ranging from very attractive (score 1) to extremely unattractive (score 10). These photographs represent a spectrum of anterior dental arrangements, including spacing, crowding, and irregularities.

When assessing a patient, the clinician compares the patient’s teeth to these photographs and assigns the most similar grade.

  • Grades 1–4: Little or no aesthetic need for treatment
  • Grades 5–7: Borderline aesthetic need for treatment
  • Grades 8–10: Great aesthetic need for treatment

 

This method helps quantify what would otherwise be a subjective judgment about dental appearance. It also allows for consistency when evaluating multiple patients or when making funding decisions in public dental programs.

 

How the IOTN is Used in Practice

In clinical practice, the IOTN is used as a diagnostic and administrative tool. It assists in determining treatment priorities, documenting the severity of malocclusion, and justifying orthodontic care for insurance or government funding purposes.

For example:

  • In the UK, the National Health Service (NHS) uses the IOTN to determine eligibility for free orthodontic treatment. Only patients who fall within Dental Health Component Grades 4 or 5, or Aesthetic Component Grades 8–10, are entitled to NHS-funded orthodontic treatment.
  • In research, the IOTN provides a standardized method for comparing orthodontic needs across populations.
  • For clinicians, it helps in explaining to patients whether their condition truly warrants treatment or is more of a cosmetic choice.

 

Advantages of the IOTN

The IOTN offers several benefits that make it one of the most widely used orthodontic indices in the world:

  1. Objectivity:
    It provides clear, measurable criteria that reduce personal bias in assessing treatment need.
  2. Simplicity:
    The index is straightforward to use once the clinician is trained, and the grading system is easy to remember.
  3. Reliability:
    Studies have shown that the IOTN produces consistent results between different examiners.
  4. Comprehensiveness:
    It covers both functional (Dental Health Component) and aesthetic (Aesthetic Component) aspects of orthodontic need.
  5. Policy Usefulness:
    It is particularly valuable in public health systems for prioritizing limited orthodontic resources and ensuring fair access.

 

Limitations of the IOTN

Despite its widespread use, the IOTN is not without limitations:

  1. Aesthetic Subjectivity:
    While the Aesthetic Component tries to standardize appearance assessment, it still depends on personal judgment, which can vary among clinicians and patients.
  2. Cultural Variation:
    Perception of dental attractiveness can differ significantly between cultures, making the aesthetic scale less universal.
  3. Focus on the Worst Feature:
    The DHC records only the most severe feature of a malocclusion, which may overlook cumulative effects of multiple moderate issues.
  4. Lack of Psychosocial Consideration:
    The index does not account for psychological or emotional impacts that dental appearance might have on an individual.
  5. Limited Application in Mixed Dentition:
    The IOTN is mainly applicable to permanent dentition and may not accurately represent treatment need in younger children.

 

Clinical Importance

The IOTN has become a cornerstone in orthodontic assessment because it ensures that treatment decisions are evidence-based and equitable. It promotes transparency between clinicians and patients, clarifying why some individuals are prioritized for treatment while others are not.

In addition, the IOTN helps:

  • Identify patients at risk of dental trauma or periodontal issues due to malocclusion.
  • Support long-term oral health planning.
  • Facilitate communication among dental professionals.
  • Serve as a useful teaching and research tool.

 

Conclusion

The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) is an essential tool for modern orthodontics. It allows dentists and orthodontists to objectively evaluate how much a person’s dental condition affects both health and appearance. By dividing the evaluation into the Dental Health Component and Aesthetic Component, the IOTN ensures that both functional and cosmetic aspects are taken into account.

From minor misalignments requiring no treatment to severe craniofacial anomalies demanding immediate attention, the IOTN provides a structured and fair framework for assessment. Its adoption in many countries’ healthcare systems demonstrates its reliability, consistency, and practical value.

Ultimately, the IOTN promotes fair access to orthodontic care, guiding both clinicians and patients toward informed, justified, and effective treatment decisions.

 

References

  1. Brook, P. H., & Shaw, W. C. (1989). The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. European Journal of Orthodontics, 11(3), 309–320.
  2. Shaw, W. C. (1991). The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 79(4), 399–415.
  3. Evans, R., & Shaw, W. C. (1987). Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. European Journal of Orthodontics, 9(4), 314–318.
  4. Richmond, S., Shaw, W. C., O’Brien, K. D., Buchanan, I. B., Jones, R., Stephens, C. D., Roberts, C. T., & Andrews, M. (1994). The relationship between the index of orthodontic treatment need and consensus opinion of need. British Journal of Orthodontics, 21(2), 185–188.
  5. Burden, D. J. (1998). The influence of social class, gender, and peer group on the uptake of orthodontic treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics, 20(3), 233–238.
  6. World Health Organization (WHO). (2013). Oral health surveys: Basic methods (5th ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization.
  7. Al Yami, E. A., Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M., & van ’t Hof, M. A. (1998). Assessment of orthodontic treatment need with the Dental Aesthetic Index and the IOTN index. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 114(4), 451–455.
  8. Daniels, C., & Richmond, S. (2000). The development of the index of complexity, outcome, and need (ICON). Journal of Orthodontics, 27(2), 149–162.
  9. Proffit, W. R., Fields, H. W., Larson, B. E., & Sarver, D. M. (2018). Contemporary Orthodontics (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
  10. Bishara, S. E. (2001). Textbook of Orthodontics. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.