Endodontics has evolved significantly over the years, bringing about a wide range of procedures to ensure the longevity and health of teeth that have been compromised by infection, trauma, or other factors. Among these endodontic procedures, apexification holds a crucial role in managing cases of immature permanent teeth with non-vital pulps. This technique encourages the formation of a calcified barrier at the apex of an immature tooth, facilitating future endodontic treatment. Apexification is essential in saving a tooth that would otherwise face extraction, especially in young patients where the roots are not fully developed.
In this article, we will explore the definition, indications, clinical techniques, success rates, materials used, and recent advances in apexification. We will also highlight the importance of this procedure and its impact on endodontic treatment planning.
Â
Anatomy of an Immature Tooth
Before delving into apexification, it’s essential to understand the anatomy of immature teeth. In children, teeth may not have fully developed roots and the apical closure might not have occurred. When these teeth experience trauma, infection, or decay, they are at risk of pulp necrosis, which stops the further development of the root. The tooth remains with an open apex—known as an “immature apex”—which presents challenges for traditional root canal treatment.
An immature tooth typically has:
- A wide-open apex (open apices), which makes it difficult to achieve an apical seal during endodontic treatment.
- Thin, fragile dentinal walls that are prone to fracture.
- Limited root length, increasing the risk of poor long-term prognosis without intervention.
Â
In cases where pulp vitality is lost before the tooth has fully developed, apexification becomes the procedure of choice.
Â
Definition of Apexification
Apexification is defined as a method of inducing a calcified barrier or continued apical development in the root of an immature tooth with an open apex and a non-vital pulp. The primary goal is to promote the formation of a hard tissue barrier across the root end, allowing the tooth to be subsequently filled using conventional root canal filling techniques. Traditionally, this has been achieved using calcium hydroxide or newer materials like Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA).
Â
Indications for Apexification
Apexification is primarily indicated in the following situations:
- Non-vital immature permanent teeth
- Chronic periapical abscess
- Open apex
Â
Non-vital immature permanent teeth
Teeth that have suffered from trauma or infection where the root development is incomplete.
Chronic periapical abscess
In cases where the periapical tissues are affected, apexification can help in restoring health to the area while promoting apical closure.
Open apex
In teeth with wide-open apices where achieving a conventional apical seal with root canal obturation is difficult or impossible.
Â
Objectives of Apexification
The main objectives of apexification are:
- Induce apical closure
- Prevent further periapical infection
- Strengthen tooth structure
Â
Induce apical closure
Promote the formation of a hard tissue barrier at the apex to facilitate further treatment.
Prevent further periapical infection
Controlling the infection is critical to the long-term health of the tooth.
Strengthen tooth structure
Allow the tooth to remain functional by reinforcing the root and preventing future fractures.
Â
Materials Used in Apexification
Various materials have been used over the years in apexification procedures. These materials aim to induce hard tissue formation, create an apical seal, and maintain or improve the overall health of the periapical tissue. Below are the main materials used in apexification:
- Calcium Hydroxide
- Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)
- Biodentine
- Tricalcium Silicate Cements
Â
Calcium Hydroxide
Calcium hydroxide has traditionally been the gold standard for apexification. Its properties include antibacterial activity, promotion of mineralization, and stimulation of hard tissue formation. Calcium hydroxide is placed within the root canal system, stimulating the surrounding tissues to form a hard tissue barrier at the apex.
- Advantages: It is relatively inexpensive, easy to apply, and promotes apical closure effectively.
- Disadvantages: The process is slow and can take anywhere from 6 months to 2 years. Additionally, long-term use of calcium hydroxide may weaken the root structure and increase the risk of root fracture.
Â
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)
MTA has become increasingly popular due to its superior properties and quicker results compared to calcium hydroxide. MTA is biocompatible, promotes the formation of a hard tissue barrier, and provides an excellent seal. MTA can induce a hard tissue barrier at the apex in a single visit, as opposed to calcium hydroxide’s multiple-visit approach.
- Advantages: High biocompatibility, excellent sealing properties, and reduced treatment time.
- Disadvantages: Expensive and can be technically challenging to manipulate.
Â
Biodentine
Biodentine is a relatively new material that has been gaining attention in apexification. It is biocompatible, promotes mineralization, and can be used as an alternative to MTA in apical barrier formation. Biodentine sets quicker than MTA and has a similar mineral composition, enhancing its potential to promote dentin regeneration.
- Advantages: Fast setting time, excellent handling properties, and promotes healing.
- Disadvantages: Its long-term outcomes in apexification are still being studied.
Â
Tricalcium Silicate Cements
Other tricalcium silicate-based materials are being developed as alternatives to MTA and Biodentine. These materials share many of the same properties, including biocompatibility and the ability to form a mineralized barrier at the apex.
Â
Apexification Steps
The success of apexification largely depends on the correct application of the chosen material and proper clinical technique. The procedure typically involves the following steps:
- Diagnosis and Case Selection
- Access and Cleaning
- Placement of Medicament (if necessary)
- Placement of Apexification Material
- Follow-Up and Radiographic Monitoring
- Completion of Root Canal Treatment
Â
Diagnosis and Case Selection
The tooth in question must be assessed thoroughly. Radiographs and clinical examination are essential to determine if the apex is open and whether the pulp is non-vital. Diagnosis should confirm the need for apexification and rule out the potential for revascularization or other treatment modalities.
Access and Cleaning
The clinician begins by creating an access cavity to reach the root canal system. The canal is then thoroughly cleaned and shaped using irrigation and gentle instrumentation to remove any necrotic tissue and debris. Care is taken to avoid damaging the fragile walls of the immature tooth.
Placement of Medicament (if necessary)
If infection is present, an intracanal medicament like calcium hydroxide may be placed within the canal to disinfect it over a few weeks. After ensuring the canal is infection-free, apexification can proceed.
Placement of Apexification Material
Once the canal is disinfected and dry, the apexification material (such as MTA or calcium hydroxide) is carefully placed at the apical end of the root canal. If using calcium hydroxide, this may require periodic replacement until an apical barrier forms, which can take several months. If using MTA, the material is typically placed in a single visit, followed by a coronal seal.
Follow-Up and Radiographic Monitoring
Regular follow-ups are critical to assess the progress of apexification. Radiographs are taken to check for the formation of the calcified barrier and the health of the surrounding periapical tissues.
Completion of Root Canal Treatment
Once a hard tissue barrier has formed, the root canal system can be obturated using a standard root canal filling technique, typically gutta-percha with sealer.
Â
Factors Affecting Success in Apexification
Apexification is a delicate procedure with multiple factors influencing its success. These factors include:
- Patient age
- Extent of periapical infection
- Proper disinfection
- Root canal anatomy
Â
Patient age
Younger patients tend to have better healing potential and faster barrier formation due to increased regenerative capacity.
Extent of periapical infection
In cases where severe infection is present, apexification may take longer, or the prognosis may be less favorable.
Proper disinfection
Maintaining a clean root canal system free of bacteria is critical for successful barrier formation.
Root canal anatomy
Complex or curved canals may complicate treatment and hinder the formation of a proper barrier.
Â
Success Rates of Apexification
Studies on apexification, particularly using MTA, show high success rates, often above 85%. The introduction of MTA significantly improved outcomes compared to the traditional calcium hydroxide method, which has a success rate around 70-80%. Long-term prognosis is also better with MTA due to reduced treatment time and lower risk of root fracture.
Â
Limitations and Drawbacks of Apexification
Despite the benefits, apexification has several limitations:
- Time-consuming with calcium hydroxide
- Fragile tooth structure
- Cost
- No continued root development
Â
Time-consuming with calcium hydroxide
The traditional calcium hydroxide method requires repeated visits over months or even years.
Fragile tooth structure
Immature teeth remain fragile due to thin root walls, and prolonged use of calcium hydroxide may increase the risk of fracture.
Cost
Materials like MTA are expensive, and the procedure can be cost-prohibitive for some patients.
No continued root development
While apexification induces a hard tissue barrier, it does not promote continued root growth, meaning the tooth remains vulnerable compared to one that underwent natural development.
Â
Recent Advances in Apexification
The development of new materials and techniques continues to improve apexification outcomes. Notably, regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) have emerged as an alternative treatment, aiming to regenerate the pulp-dentin complex and promote continued root development in immature teeth. REPs involve disinfection of the canal, placement of a scaffold (usually blood clot or platelet-rich fibrin), and sealing with biocompatible materials like MTA or Biodentine.
Additionally, new biomimetic materials are being developed to better mimic the natural healing and regeneration process of dental tissues. These materials hold the potential to reduce treatment times further and improve long-term outcomes.
Â
Conclusion
Apexification remains a vital procedure in the field of endodontics, especially for managing immature teeth with non-vital pulps. While traditional calcium hydroxide apexification is effective, it has its limitations, leading to the development of faster, more reliable materials like MTA and Biodentine. The choice of material, clinical technique, and patient selection all contribute to the success of the procedure.
Although apexification does not promote continued root growth, it offers an excellent solution for salvaging teeth that would otherwise be lost, preserving function and aesthetics. Looking forward, regenerative techniques may revolutionize the treatment of immature teeth, offering the possibility of not only closing the apex but promoting true regeneration of the dental tissues.
